| Reduced Risk Status: |
|
| IPM Compatibility: |
Per Requester: Good Fit; Increased efficacy when compared to alternative selective herbicides (under all pest levels), avoids use of non-selective herbicides. Costs more than current options but provides better value in terms of overall weed management Non-target effects, Resistance concerns, and environmental fate and worker risk have all already been identified and addressed in application scenarios/locations similar to what is requested - this is just an additional forage crop, not a whole new use site:07/26;
|
| Reasons for need: |
broadleaf weeds. There are currently very few options for post emergence control of broadleaf weeds in perennial peanut. In many cases, injurious applications of glyphosate are used. A new active ingredient with a broad range of activity and relatively little damage to the peanut would be very advantageous for growers. Current technologies used: combination of 2,4-d + imazapic + glyphosate
|
| Requesting State(s): |
FL:Mauldin, M* ;
|
| PCR Use Pattern: |
Use NovaGraz as a foliar application in post-emergence twice at 24 to 48 fluid ounces (0.008375-0.016875 lb a.i. florpyrauxifen benzyl and 0.5 - 1.0 lb a.e. 2,4-D); 60-day RTI; 14-day PHI
|
| EPA Default Residue Trials: |
|
| IR-4 Residue Trial Plan: |
|
| Residue Protocol Use Pattern: |
|
| Efficacy/Crop Safety (E/CS) Data Required: |
|
| E/CS Research Comments: |
|
| Label Use Pattern Submitted To EPA: |
|
| EPA PIF Status: |
|
| EPA Status: |
|
| EPA PRIA Date: |
|
| MRID: |
|
| Comments: |
|
| International Status: |
|
| Archive Location: |
|
| QA Archive: |
|