| Reduced Risk Status: |
THIS AI HAS BEEN CLASSIFIED AS RR FOR ONE OR MORE FOOD USES.
|
| IPM Compatibility: |
Per Requester: Good Fit; Fungicides are the most cost effective way for mint to manage rust and powdery mildew. Currently we have a limited number of actives available for use. We need to expand our portfolio to defend against resistance development. Fungicides fit well in mint IPM strategy. With more actives that are not propiconazole and azoxy, there will be less potential for resistance, lower residue levels from multiple applications of same actives, and potentially provide assistance in additional disease control such as Phoma:06/26;
|
| Reasons for need: |
Rust, powdery mildew, phoma sp. Primary: Rust. Limited fungicides available to mint producers. Need to expand portfolio to manage and prevent resistance development. We are also experiencing more concern regarding Phoma in mint fields and penthiopyrad may have some effect on this pathogen. Current technologies used: propiconazole and azoxystrobin are most common:06/26;
|
| Requesting State(s): |
OR:Salisbury, S* ;
|
| PCR Use Pattern: |
Use Fontelis; 24 fl. oz/A; 3 foliar applications at 14 to 30 day interval
|
| EPA Default Residue Trials: |
5-2 11-3
|
| IR-4 Residue Trial Plan: |
|
| Residue Protocol Use Pattern: |
|
| Efficacy/Crop Safety (E/CS) Data Required: |
|
| E/CS Research Comments: |
|
| Label Use Pattern Submitted To EPA: |
|
| EPA PIF Status: |
|
| EPA Status: |
|
| EPA PRIA Date: |
|
| MRID: |
|
| Comments: |
Key Export Market: EU.
|
| International Status: |
|
| Archive Location: |
|
| QA Archive: |
|