| Reduced Risk Status: |
|
| IPM Compatibility: |
Per Requester: Good Fit; The mode of action of pioxaniliprole is considered more of a reduced-risk to beneficial insects than chlorpyrifos, which was used for grape root borer management:06/26;
|
| Reasons for need: |
Grape Root borer. With the loss of chlorpyrifos, there are limited (basically only bifenthrin) chemistries labeled for use against grape root borer in grapes. Current technologies: Mating disruption has been adopted by several growers, but it is not practical or effective across all scenarios. Additionally, the one commercially available mating disruption product is not labeled and requires a Section-18 in order to use:06/26; NJ:Grape root borer can be a significant pest of grapes where present. Very few pesticides are available and options are further limited with the loss of chlorpyrifos:08/26; VA:requires a Section-18 request for mating disruption:08/26; PA:adds a new moa to control pest:08/26;
|
| Requesting State(s): |
DE:Owens, D ; GA:Blaauw, B* ; KY:Bessin, R ; NJ:Spies, J ; PA:Krawczyk, G ; SC:Blaauw, B ; VA:Frank, D ;
|
| PCR Use Pattern: |
Per MFG, HQ suggests: 125–150 g a.i./ha, 2–4 applications per season with a 5-day PHI, using 70% WG formulation.
|
| EPA Default Residue Trials: |
1-2 10-8 11/12-2
|
| IR-4 Residue Trial Plan: |
|
| Residue Protocol Use Pattern: |
|
| Efficacy/Crop Safety (E/CS) Data Required: |
|
| E/CS Research Comments: |
|
| Label Use Pattern Submitted To EPA: |
|
| EPA PIF Status: |
Blue:08/26;
|
| EPA Status: |
|
| EPA PRIA Date: |
|
| MRID: |
|
| Comments: |
PI Ind supports as Researchable, Res & E/CS Data Needed:06/26; EPA Pending:08/26/sb;
|
| International Status: |
|
| Archive Location: |
|
| QA Archive: |
|