| Reduced Risk Status: |
|
| IPM Compatibility: |
Very Good Fit, A growth regulator alternative to intensive hand labor would be a significant contribution to an IPM program as a strategy to reduce pathogen spread and prevent plant damage which provides a conduit for pathogen infection.
|
| Reasons for need: |
Removing the flower/drupe is desirable to enhance yield. Currently, this achieved through intensive labor which is difficult to find and expensive. Labor crews moving through the plantings cause plant damage and pathogen spread. This growth regulator serves to cause abscission of the flower so that the drupe/seed doesn't form.
|
| Requesting State(s): |
MI:Hausbeck, M* ;
|
| PCR Use Pattern: |
156 to 300 fl oz/ 100 gallons of water with 1 to 2 Foliar application(s) beginning at 25% bud opening with a retreatment interval of 2 weeks and a PHI of 30 to 90 days.
|
| EPA Default Residue Trials: |
5-4
|
| IR-4 Residue Trial Plan: |
5-4
|
| Residue Protocol Use Pattern: |
|
| Efficacy/Crop Safety (E/CS) Data Required: |
|
| E/CS Research Comments: |
|
| Label Use Pattern Submitted To EPA: |
|
| EPA PIF Status: |
EPA RED: 08/23
|
| EPA Status: |
|
| EPA PRIA Date: |
|
| MRID: |
|
| Comments: |
This chemistry has never been in a food production system, JPB 7/3/23;; EPA HOLD: 08/23
|
| International Status: |
|
| Archive Location: |
|
| QA Archive: |
|