| Reduced Risk Status: |
|
| IPM Compatibility: |
PER REQUESTOR, VERYGOODFIT, EXCELLENT FIT INTO CULTURAL PRACTICES AND PEST MANAGEMENT DURING BLOSSOM AND PETAL FALL PERIODS. THIS COULD HELP THE INDUSTRY STAY PROFITABLE WITH RISING LABOR COSTS. IT MAY REDUCE DISEASES SUCH AS FIRE BLIGHT.
|
| Reasons for need: |
FLOWER/FRUIT THINNING, REDUCE LABOR COSTS FOR THINNING FLOWER AND FRUIT USING A NATURAL PRODUCT
|
| Requesting State(s): |
CA:Adaskaveg, J* ; NJ:Cowgill, W ; OR:Galimba, K ; WA:Schmidt, T ;
|
| PCR Use Pattern: |
ACCEDE; UNKNOWN DOSAGE RATE; AIR-BLAST 100 TO 150 GALLONS/A, 1 APPLICATION, PHI OF 60 DAYS; FOLLOW APPLE LABEL
|
| EPA Default Residue Trials: |
1 10-3 11-4
|
| IR-4 Residue Trial Plan: |
|
| Residue Protocol Use Pattern: |
|
| Efficacy/Crop Safety (E/CS) Data Required: |
|
| E/CS Research Comments: |
|
| Label Use Pattern Submitted To EPA: |
|
| EPA PIF Status: |
|
| EPA Status: |
|
| EPA PRIA Date: |
|
| MRID: |
|
| Comments: |
E/CS data was generated under IS00420 that mfg will review to see if data is sufficient to add pest/crop to label:05/24/sb; status updated at 2024 workshop from Needs E/CS only to Mfg Objective:09/24/sb;
|
| International Status: |
|
| Archive Location: |
|
| QA Archive: |
|