| Reduced Risk Status: |
|
| IPM Compatibility: |
PER REQUESTOR VERYGOODFIT, EXCELLENT FIT INTO CULTURAL PRACTICES AND PEST MANAGEMENT DURING BLOSSOM AND PETAL FALL PERIODS. THIS COULD HELP THE INDUSTRY STAY PROFITABLE WITH RISING LABOR COSTS.
|
| Reasons for need: |
FLOWER FRUIT THINNING, REDUCE LABOR COSTS FOR THINNING FLOWER AND FRUIT USING A NATURAL PRODUCT
|
| Requesting State(s): |
CA:Adaskaveg, J*, Crisoto, C ; OR:Galimba, K ; UT:Murray, M ;
|
| PCR Use Pattern: |
ACCEDE; UNKNOWN DOSAGE RATE; AIR-BLAST 100 TO 150 GALLONS/A, 1 APPLICATION, PHI OF 30 DAYS; FOLLOW PEACH/NECTARINE LABEL
|
| EPA Default Residue Trials: |
SOUR: 1 5-5 9 11/12; SWEET: 5-2 10-2 11-3 12
|
| IR-4 Residue Trial Plan: |
|
| Residue Protocol Use Pattern: |
|
| Efficacy/Crop Safety (E/CS) Data Required: |
|
| E/CS Research Comments: |
PER THE 2024 PERFORMANCE PROTOCOL: TESTING FOLIAR DIRECTED APPLIC OF 3 RATES OF ACCEDE 40SG (+ NONIONIC SURFACTANT [NIS] AT 0.05% V/V), 150, 300, 450 PPM, APPLIED IN 100 GPA, TARGETING A SINGLE APPLIC AT 50-75% OPEN BLOOM; AN OPTIONAL TRT IS 300 PPM APPLIED TWICE, 7-10 DAY INTERVAL, BEGINNING WHEN A MAJORITY OFBLLOMS ARE IN THE POPCORN/BALLOON STAGE, JUST PRIOR TO FULL BLOOM; TRIALS ARE TO BE CONTINUED INTO A SECOND YEAR, WITH TRTS APPLIED TO THE SAME PLOTS IN BOTH YEARS; EVALUATE CROP SAFETY, FRUIT THINNING AND CROP YIELD
|
| Label Use Pattern Submitted To EPA: |
|
| EPA PIF Status: |
|
| EPA Status: |
|
| EPA PRIA Date: |
|
| MRID: |
|
| Comments: |
Performance protocol signed, changed status from "Need E/CS data only" to " E/CS ongoing" 02/24/drs;
|
| International Status: |
|
| Archive Location: |
|
| QA Archive: |
|