| Reduced Risk Status: |
THIS AI HAS BEEN CLASSIFIED AS RR FOR ONE OR MORE FOOD USES.
|
| IPM Compatibility: |
FROM WSR 2015 NOMINATION COMMENT: FAIR IPM FIT; IS A MODE OF ACTION 22A PRODUCT, NOT A NEONIC; NEED LYGUS MATERIALS, BUT THIS MAY NOT BE BEST CHOICE; FROM NER 2017 NOMINATION: FAIR IPM FIT; RESISTANCE MANAGEMENT; FROM WSR 2017 NOMINATION: FAIR IPM FIT; LYGUS IS THE PRIMARY TARGET FOR AVAUNT IN STRAWBERRY; THE AMT REPORTS SHOW EFFICACY AT OR ABOVE THE CURRENT STANDARDS; RESISTANCE IS A HUGE ISSUE, SO HAVING ANOTHER MOA WOULD BE BENEFICIAL; IPM VERY GOOD TO EXCELLENT; THE CHEMICAL AND INSECTICIDAL PROPERTIES OF INDOXACARB MAKE IT A GOOD CANDIDATE FOR INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS (IPM), MORE SO THAN MOST OTHER INSECTICIDAL PRODUCTS; INDOXACARB IS A VERY EFFECTIVE CROP-PROTECTION PRODUCT, WITH LOW TOXICITY TO NON-TARGET ORGANISMS AND A SHORT PERSISTENCE IN THE ENVIRONMENT; FOR DETAILED INFORMATION, YOU CAN ACCESS THE PDF FILE BY COPYING THIS URL TO YOUR WEB BROWSER: “HTTP://IR4APP.RUTGERS.EDU/FDM/DOC/IPMCOMMENT/INDOXACARB FIT IN IPM_FINAL.PDF”
|
| Reasons for need: |
LEAFROLLER, SAP BEETLE, CLIPPER, PLANT BUG (INCLUDING LYGUS); PER PROJECT NOMINATION JUSTIFICATION COMMENTS: THE NEED IN STRAWBERRY IS FOR LYGUS CONTROL - EFFICACY IS NOT OUTSTANDING, AS IT IS A TOUGH PEST TO MANAGE; NEED TO ADDRESS POLLINATOR PROTECTION
|
| Requesting State(s): |
CA:Rocha, J.L., ; MI:Wise, J. ; NC:Sorensen, K. ; NJ:Shearer, P. ; OR:DeFrancesco, J. ; PA:Biddinger, D. ; WI:Heider, D ;
|
| PCR Use Pattern: |
0.11 LB AI/A; 2 FOLIAR APPLIC/SEASON; 7-DAY PHI
|
| EPA Default Residue Trials: |
1 2 3 5 10-3 12
|
| IR-4 Residue Trial Plan: |
1 2 3 5 10-3 12; 1 TRIAL IS A DECLINE
|
| Residue Protocol Use Pattern: |
|
| Efficacy/Crop Safety (E/CS) Data Required: |
SUGGEST NEED FOR GOOD RESULTS (ESPECIALLY FOR LYGUS CONTROL) FROM A MINIMUM 3-4 TRIALS IN LOCATIONS WHERE TARGET PESTS CAN BE EVALUATED (PA, NJ, NC, MI, OR, CA, EPA REGION 3, ETC.); PER MFG, NO MORE E/CS DATA NEEDED:09/19
|
| E/CS Research Comments: |
2016 PERFORMANCE PROTOCOL INCLUDES 2 RATES OF AVAUNT + NIS ADJUVANT VS A STANDARD, MAX 2 APPLIC NO LESS THAN 7 DAYS APART; PRIMARY TARGET PEST IS TARNISHED PLANT BUG; DATA TO BE COLLECTED INCLUDES PEST CONTROL, CROP INJURY AND CROP YIELD/QUALITY
|
| Label Use Pattern Submitted To EPA: |
|
| EPA PIF Status: |
EPA YELLOW 2017
|
| EPA Status: |
2E9044
PEND:03/21
QA:09/20
SUB:12/22
PROP:02/24
RULE:08/24
|
| EPA PRIA Date: |
4/9/24, rev. 5/17/24
|
| MRID: |
52075005
|
| Comments: |
EPA CAUTION:08/15; FROM DISCUSSION AT 2015 FUW, CHANGED STATUS FROM NEEDING ONLY RESIDUE DATA; STAKEHOLDERS DECIDED MORE E/CS DATA IS NEEDED BEFORE COMMITTING TO A RESIDUE STUDY; WAS MADE A "+" (H+) FOR THE 2016 PERFORMANCE PROGRAM:09/15; MFG CONFIRMED E/CS DATA REQUIREMENT IS FULFILLED; NOW ONLY NEED RESIDUE DATA:09/15/16; EPA CAUTION:08/17
|
| International Status: |
|
| Archive Location: |
104-3; 002982, 002983, SUB DOC 58-5
|
| QA Archive: |
O-4, 002816, 48-5
|