| Reduced Risk Status: |
|
| IPM Compatibility: |
PER REQUESTOR: GOOD IPM FIT, AS ADOPTION OF THIS TECHNOLOGY WOULD BE KEEPING ADDITIONAL METHODS TO DEAL WITH WEED CONTROL OTHER THAN JUST CROP ROTATION AND LIMITED AVAILABILITY OF HERBICIDES; WOULD BE AN AID IN MANAGING WEED RESISTANCE:04/18
|
| Reasons for need: |
ALL BROADLEAF WEEDS, THISTLES; ALL BROAD LEAF WEEDS HAVE AN IMPACT ON CORIANDER (MAIN EFFECT IS YIELD LOSS, TO SOME DEGREE QUALITY IN HIGH DOCKAGE SITUATIONS, AND THE LONG TERM EFFECT OF AN INCREASE IN THE WEED BANK IN SOILS), AS IT IS EXTREMELY SLOW TO GROW; ALL WEEDS ARE PROBLEMATIC FOR THE FULL SEASON AS CORIANDER GROWS AN OPEN CANOPY WHICH ALLOWS LATER SEASON WEED FLUSHES IF MOISTURE IS ADEQUATE; USE IS NEEDED SINCE THE CURRENT HERBICIDE LOROX (NOT SO GOOD ON THISTLES) IS BEING RE-EVALUATED AND MAY BE LOST AS A WEED CONTROL TOOL
|
| Requesting State(s): |
MT:Burrows, M ;
|
| PCR Use Pattern: |
MAKE 1 OR 2 FOLIAR APPLIC; NO OTHER USE PATTERN INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED
|
| EPA Default Residue Trials: |
|
| IR-4 Residue Trial Plan: |
|
| Residue Protocol Use Pattern: |
|
| Efficacy/Crop Safety (E/CS) Data Required: |
MFG INDICATES CANADIAN EFFICACY DATA IS NOT SUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT THE USE IN THE U.S., AS WEED SPECTRUM MAY BE DIFFERENT:07/18
|
| E/CS Research Comments: |
|
| Label Use Pattern Submitted To EPA: |
|
| EPA PIF Status: |
GREEN:09/18, 09/19, 08/20, 08/21
|
| EPA Status: |
|
| EPA PRIA Date: |
|
| MRID: |
|
| Comments: |
CANADA IS A KEY EXPORT MARKET:04/18; MFG SUPPORTS, RESIDUE AND PERFORMANCE DATA NEEDED; NEED RESIDUE DATA AS MFG DOES NOT HAVE DATA OR TOLERANCES ESTABLISHED TO COVER CORIANDER SEED (THERE IS DATA THAT SUPPORTS LEAFY HERBS, INCLUDING CILANTRO):07/18; EPA GREEN:09/18 & 09/19 & 08/20, 08/21; WA HAS 24C LABELS ON MANY SEED CROPS:09/20; ONLY CS DATA NEEDED AND SHOULD BE FROM CALIFORNIA:05/21 ; DROPPED DUE TO 3 YEAR NON-NOMINATION 2023.
|
| International Status: |
|
| Archive Location: |
|
| QA Archive: |
|