| Reduced Risk Status: |
|
| IPM Compatibility: |
FROM SOR 2017 NOMINATION: GOOD IPM FIT; IF CROP TOLERANCE IS THERE, THIS COULD BE VERY USEFUL TO DEAL WITH PROBLEM WEEDS, INCLUDING SOME PERENNIALS
|
| Reasons for need: |
PRIMOCANE SUPPRESSION; FROM NOMINATION COMMENTS: ALSO NEEDED FOR WEED CONTROL, PARTICULARLY CONTROL OF GLYPHOSATE RESISTANT HORSEWEED, NOW A PROBLEM IN MOST BERRY CROP PRODUCTION AREAS; GLUFOSINATE IS AN EFFECTIVE CONTROL, BETTER THAN PARAQUAT
|
| Requesting State(s): |
CA:Smith, R. ; NC:Mitchem, W ; OR: ; WA: ;
|
| PCR Use Pattern: |
POST-DIRECTED; 0.5-1.0 LB AI/A; MAKE 1-3 APPLIC AS DIRECTED SPRAYS TO THE BASE OF THE PLANTS TO CONTROL EMERGING PRIMOCANES IN FLORICANE PRODUCTION FIELDS; 7-10 DAY RETREATMENT INTERVALS; 45-DAY PHI
|
| EPA Default Residue Trials: |
1/2 5 10 12-3
|
| IR-4 Residue Trial Plan: |
HOLD:MFG
|
| Residue Protocol Use Pattern: |
|
| Efficacy/Crop Safety (E/CS) Data Required: |
|
| E/CS Research Comments: |
|
| Label Use Pattern Submitted To EPA: |
|
| EPA PIF Status: |
|
| EPA Status: |
|
| EPA PRIA Date: |
|
| MRID: |
|
| Comments: |
ORIGINAL REQUEST REC'D 10/1/1992; WSR (CA) REACTIVATED REQUEST, SUPPORTING DATA RECD AND RE-SUBMITTED TO MFG FOR EVALUATION:04/08; MFG HOLD; RISK CUP NEARLY FULL:07/08; MFG WILL REVISIT AFTER RE-REG REVIEW IS COMPLETED BY EPA:05/16; MFG QUESTIONS IF THIS USE IS STILL NEEDED, AS THERE IS CONCERN FOR GLUFOSINATE USE AS A SUCKER/CANE CONTROL METHOD:08/16; EPA CAUTION:09/16; COULD COVER PR# 12051, OR BE COVERED BY 12051:06/17; EPA CAUTION:08/17; MFG MADE POTENTIAL (AT FUW):09/17; P12051 IS ALSO COVERING P5299:04/18; CAN BE COVERED BY OTHER CANEBERRY REQUEST, PR# 12051:05/18
|
| International Status: |
|
| Archive Location: |
001109, 001110
|
| QA Archive: |
67-2
|